A few months back (alright, seven months back), I talked myself into buying a P229 Legion and was planning on writing a review around Christmas. Well… that didn’t happen. Life interfered, I got busy, and by the time I had the free time to write the review… I’d forgotten that I was going to write it. It’s time to remedy that!
Believe it or not, this is a question that more and more Americans have difficulty answering. The sad truth is that with each passing generation our history is being forgotten, and fewer people even know what it means to be an American.
If life were fair, all seven billion of us would have one shoe and a piece of cardboard to call home.
In general, I try to post reviews within a few weeks of picking up something. However, when I first bought my XD-S I wasn’t publishing reviews of anything but software and, given it has become my everyday carry, I thought it deserved a review of its own. It’s no secret that I’ve always been a 1911 fan; why wouldn’t I be? The 1911 design is classic. It’s been considered by many to be the pinnacle of handgun design for a century, it’s rugged, dependable and has served our military with distinction in two world wars. But, for all its advantages, it’s simply not designed for carry.
I did this colorization just a few days after my Jean Harlow colorization. I’m not sure where the original photo came from, but the project was requested by a user on Reddit. A photo from the 1800’s provides a unique challenge in comparison to one from the early to mid 1900’s. Admittedly, a fairly easy challenge to work past, but a challenge nonetheless. Unlike more modern photography, early photographs frequently aren’t actually black and white. For a variety of reasons that I’ll try to cover in another post, many early photographs are brown, red or even purple hued. This makes immediately coloring the photograph difficult, so the first step in coloring these early pictures is to actually strip the existing colors so that we’re working with a true black and white image.
I’ve never really been a big fan of Reddit. Actually, I’d never actually posted to it until a few weeks ago. After my last colorization, I did a ton of research and studying, particularly in terms of how to properly handle skin tones. As a result of that research, I discovered that there’s actually a colorization group that does weekly group color challenges. Each week, a black and white image is chosen, and the group is challenged to submit a colorization of the image. It’s not a contest, but rather a chance for everyone to learn, practice and challenge themselves to improve.
It has been a long time since I used, let alone owned, anything that fits in the “pocket pistol” category. Several years ago, I had a run-in with an older Ruger LCP that left a bad taste in my mouth and I swore off of .380 ACP forever… or so I thought. In all fairness, I never really gave the smaller calibers a chance, judging them universally for the failures of a specific weapon that had been treated poorly by its owner. Thankfully, the Micro Carry came along and gave me a chance to change my opinion.
This colorization was done almost a month after the 54 Cutlass Concept colorization I discussed previously. In that month I did a fair amount of studying in regards to the techniques that go into recoloring an image. Obviously, I still hadn’t mastered skin tones (to be honest, I’d say I still haven’t mastered it), but my overall technique had changed.
My second colorization attempt! Previously, I told you about the incredibly inefficient process I used in my first colorization. Well, I didn’t learn anything from the experience. Well… maybe I learned a little, but I used the same process to color this image of a 1954 Cutlass concept car. I’m not 100% sure where I found this image, but I liked the car, so I thought I’d give it a shot!